<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $100 million in 90 Days</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/</link>
	<description>Conservative analysis of political current events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 02:54:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-23152</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/#comment-23152</guid>
		<description>Wow!  They want to cut the budget 0.01% what is significant move by the president!  And they&#039;re going to take 90 days to do it?  That&#039;s the most insignificant major budget change ever made by any politician.  If they were talking $100 billion it might be worth talking about what this amount could be saved by just cutting out some of the lunches and special events they setup.  Why not make a politically significant move and cut out all pork barrel spending that comes from Congress?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  They want to cut the budget 0.01% what is significant move by the president!  And they&#8217;re going to take 90 days to do it?  That&#8217;s the most insignificant major budget change ever made by any politician.  If they were talking $100 billion it might be worth talking about what this amount could be saved by just cutting out some of the lunches and special events they setup.  Why not make a politically significant move and cut out all pork barrel spending that comes from Congress?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enid</title>
		<link>http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-23137</link>
		<dc:creator>enid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/#comment-23137</guid>
		<description>A - 100 million
B - 1 billion
C - 7 trillion

Which one did Obama&#039;s Staff say they were going to save on TP in the Whitehouse?
(A)  (B)  or (C)

(A) of course.  !00 is a lot bigger than 7 - isn&#039;t it?

Sit down and have a cup of Earl Grey tea Mr. President - get a piece of paper and do the math - then you&#039;ll know why we were out there on April 15th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A &#8211; 100 million<br />
B &#8211; 1 billion<br />
C &#8211; 7 trillion</p>
<p>Which one did Obama&#8217;s Staff say they were going to save on TP in the Whitehouse?<br />
(A)  (B)  or (C)</p>
<p>(A) of course.  !00 is a lot bigger than 7 &#8211; isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Sit down and have a cup of Earl Grey tea Mr. President &#8211; get a piece of paper and do the math &#8211; then you&#8217;ll know why we were out there on April 15th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-23132</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/#comment-23132</guid>
		<description>What a joke!  Jimmy Carter DeJaVu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a joke!  Jimmy Carter DeJaVu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhm lp tx.</title>
		<link>http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-23111</link>
		<dc:creator>dhm lp tx.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/#comment-23111</guid>
		<description>what is our president on???  I havent seen any responsiible leadership at all.  Before giving GM or anyone else Bailouts , shouldn&#039;t He require that these companies bring back the plants, &amp; jobs which are now in foreign countries, before lining their pockets.
 I believe he should hire Joe the Plummer as a consultant ,or Financial Czar. I&#039;m sure Joe could do better. If this is His start, for His Economic Recovery Plan, He is running in
the wrong direction. Someone Please!!! show him the way the man seems to be lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is our president on???  I havent seen any responsiible leadership at all.  Before giving GM or anyone else Bailouts , shouldn&#8217;t He require that these companies bring back the plants, &amp; jobs which are now in foreign countries, before lining their pockets.<br />
 I believe he should hire Joe the Plummer as a consultant ,or Financial Czar. I&#8217;m sure Joe could do better. If this is His start, for His Economic Recovery Plan, He is running in<br />
the wrong direction. Someone Please!!! show him the way the man seems to be lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liberalshatefacts</title>
		<link>http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-23092</link>
		<dc:creator>liberalshatefacts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/#comment-23092</guid>
		<description>This is just Obama&#039;s sad attempt at countering the Tea Party rallies that the lousy mainstream Obama media failed to cover with substance and integrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just Obama&#8217;s sad attempt at countering the Tea Party rallies that the lousy mainstream Obama media failed to cover with substance and integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: logicandrational</title>
		<link>http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-23088</link>
		<dc:creator>logicandrational</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/#comment-23088</guid>
		<description>Where are all of the Obama supporters??? Are these ingrates finally silenced because they have no way of defending the Messiah this time? Oh wait no need to defend Obama they stand by there continued repeated and illogical stance that this is &quot;all George Bush&#039;s fault&quot;... HAHAHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where are all of the Obama supporters??? Are these ingrates finally silenced because they have no way of defending the Messiah this time? Oh wait no need to defend Obama they stand by there continued repeated and illogical stance that this is &#8220;all George Bush&#8217;s fault&#8221;&#8230; HAHAHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-23087</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/#comment-23087</guid>
		<description>HA! HA!! HA!!! HA!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HA! HA!! HA!!! HA!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patricia</title>
		<link>http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-23083</link>
		<dc:creator>patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/#comment-23083</guid>
		<description>What a joke! Obama is spending trillions but is trying to soothe the public by requesting $100 million in cuts.  He is just trying to quiet the public because he was rattled by the rallies on April 15th.  The sad thing is that many Americans will be fooled even though it is obvious he is trying to have it both ways.  Hey mr.  President and Emanuel all Americans are not stupid and recognize politics when they see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a joke! Obama is spending trillions but is trying to soothe the public by requesting $100 million in cuts.  He is just trying to quiet the public because he was rattled by the rallies on April 15th.  The sad thing is that many Americans will be fooled even though it is obvious he is trying to have it both ways.  Hey mr.  President and Emanuel all Americans are not stupid and recognize politics when they see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-23076</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/#comment-23076</guid>
		<description>Instead of consolidating employee&#039;s and buying office supplies in bulk, how about reducing Government staff, salaries, hours, eliminate vacation time, 401k match, raise the cost of benefits, and eliminate bonuses and raises? 

It&#039;s what we have been doing in the private sector for the last 15 - 20 years I think it&#039;s the Government does the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of consolidating employee&#8217;s and buying office supplies in bulk, how about reducing Government staff, salaries, hours, eliminate vacation time, 401k match, raise the cost of benefits, and eliminate bonuses and raises? </p>
<p>It&#8217;s what we have been doing in the private sector for the last 15 &#8211; 20 years I think it&#8217;s the Government does the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nanette Olson</title>
		<link>http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-23075</link>
		<dc:creator>Nanette Olson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uspolitical.com/100-million-vs-367-trillion/#comment-23075</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see, Obama and congress just borrowed and spent about 1.2 TRILLION dollars through  a bill than none of them had read and don&#039;t really know where all that money went.  Now Obama, in response to the tax day protests, wants to make 100 million in cuts.  Sorry, CNN but I just can&#039;t get excited about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see, Obama and congress just borrowed and spent about 1.2 TRILLION dollars through  a bill than none of them had read and don&#8217;t really know where all that money went.  Now Obama, in response to the tax day protests, wants to make 100 million in cuts.  Sorry, CNN but I just can&#8217;t get excited about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

