<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>USpolitical.com &#187; U.S.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uspolitical.com/category/us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uspolitical.com</link>
	<description>Conservative analysis of political current events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 03:33:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>US Military in Context</title>
		<link>http://uspolitical.com/us-military-in-context/</link>
		<comments>http://uspolitical.com/us-military-in-context/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uspolitical.com/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just came across a fascinating website called Information is Beautiful.
One of the articles that caught my eye was one about military spending &#38; size when taking wealth and population into account.
It doesn&#8217;t seem fair to not factor in the wealth of a country when assessing its military budget.
So, if you take military budgets as a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just came across a fascinating website called <a href="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/" target="_self">Information is Beautiful</a>.</p>
<p>One of the articles that caught my eye was <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/apr/01/information-is-beautiful-military-spending" target="_self">one about military spending &amp; size</a> when taking wealth and population into account.</p>
<blockquote><p>It doesn&#8217;t seem fair to not factor in the wealth of a country when assessing its military budget.</p>
<p>So, if you take military budgets as a proportion of each country&#8217;s GDP, a very different picture emerges.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-213" title="Info-is-beautiful-defence-001" src="http://uspolitical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Info-is-beautiful-defence-001.jpg" alt="Info-is-beautiful-defence-001" width="460" height="455" /></p>
<p>The US is knocked down into 8th place by such nations as Jordan, Burundi and Georgia. The UK plunges to 29th.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uspolitical.com/us-military-in-context/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Arizona Law</title>
		<link>http://uspolitical.com/new-arizona-law/</link>
		<comments>http://uspolitical.com/new-arizona-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uspolitical.com/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In thinking about the law that was recently passed in Arizona, it seems that many of the things being talked about are just false facades to the underlying debate.  That being that you are either for open borders, or you are against open borders.  From that discussion, you can then move into what to do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In thinking about the law that was recently passed in Arizona, it seems that many of the things being talked about are just false facades to the underlying debate.  That being that you are either for open borders, or you are against open borders.  From that discussion, you can then move into what to do about the millions already over the border, if you&#8217;re able to get that far&#8230;</p>
<p>Arguing that this law will lead to unlawful racial profiling is not what it is really about.  If it were, there would be more talk about proposed solutions from those opposed to the bill.  They would be saying:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;This law will lead to racial profiling.  We can think of better ways to solve the issue of hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens in our state without possible profiling, and here it is: [ ENTER PROPOSED SOLUTION HERE ].&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not holding my breath though because in their view, there is no issue to solve.  My impression is that opponents of the law simply have no desire to allow the United States to assert its sovereignty and treat unlawful residents like, well, unlawful residents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uspolitical.com/new-arizona-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Southern States Once Controlled by Gigantic Terrorist Army</title>
		<link>http://uspolitical.com/southern-states-once-controlled-by-gigantic-terrorist-army/</link>
		<comments>http://uspolitical.com/southern-states-once-controlled-by-gigantic-terrorist-army/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uspolitical.com/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So says Roland Martin.
Even if you&#8217;re a relative of one of the 9/11 hijackers, that man was an out-and-out terrorist, and nothing you can say will change that. And if your great-great-great-granddaddy was a Confederate who stood up for Southern ideals, he too was a terrorist.
They are the same.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/04/11/martin.confederate.extremist/index.html" target="_self">So says Roland Martin.</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Even if you&#8217;re a relative of one of the 9/11 hijackers, that man was an out-and-out terrorist, and nothing you can say will change that. And if your great-great-great-granddaddy was a Confederate who stood up for Southern ideals, he too was a terrorist.</p>
<p>They are the same.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uspolitical.com/southern-states-once-controlled-by-gigantic-terrorist-army/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harry Reid&#8217;s &#8220;Negro&#8221; Comments</title>
		<link>http://uspolitical.com/harry-reids-negro-comments/</link>
		<comments>http://uspolitical.com/harry-reids-negro-comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uspolitical.com/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats seem to be ready to really show their true colors here, as always.  Instead of condemning racial impropriety, they once again fore go unbiased and equal treatment of their own.  Instead of harshly scolding Reid and threatening his position, they&#8217;ll do an about face when compared to their reaction to ambiguous (possibly racial) comments [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats seem to be ready to really show <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20100111/pl_politico/31340" target="_self">their true colors</a> here, as always.  Instead of condemning racial impropriety, they once again fore go unbiased and equal treatment of their own.  Instead of harshly scolding Reid and threatening his position, they&#8217;ll do an about face when compared to their reaction to ambiguous (possibly racial) comments Trent Lott made several years ago.</p>
<blockquote><p>First, Reid’s allies plan to distribute the NAACP vote ratings of Republican senators who have scolded him. The data will be made available to editorial boards, cable programs and the blogosphere — including votes on minimum wage, community-oriented policing, education funding and HIV/AIDS programs.</p>
<p>Separately, the <span id="lw_1263222407_1">Congressional Black Caucus plans to issue a new statement Monday</span>, defending Reid and brushing back Republicans.</p>
<p>“<span id="lw_1263222407_2">Senator Reid</span>’s record provides a stark contrast to actions of Republicans to block legislation that would benefit poor and minority communities — most recently reflected in Republican opposition to the health bill now under consideration,” CBC Chairwoman <span id="lw_1263222407_3">Barbara Lee</span> (D-Calif.) said. “I look forward to Senator Reid continuing to serve as Majority Leader to guide this important agenda through the Senate.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Classic.  Attack the messenger.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ad+hominem" target="_self">Ad Hominem:</a></p>
<p><span>–adjective :</span></p>
<p>attacking an opponent&#8217;s character rather than answering his argument.</p></blockquote>
<p>If only Democrats could stay consistent on principle&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uspolitical.com/harry-reids-negro-comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Synthetic Trees</title>
		<link>http://uspolitical.com/synthetic-trees/</link>
		<comments>http://uspolitical.com/synthetic-trees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uspolitical.com/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems like a fascinating approach to easing the transition to renewable sources of energy.  Scrubbing it out of the air with &#8220;synthetic trees.&#8221;
I&#8217;d heard about scrubbing ideas before, but I had never heard about them being close to production.
If you were to install 10 million of them, you would pull back on the order of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like a fascinating approach to easing the transition to renewable sources of energy.  <a href="http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/01/scrubbing-co2-with-synthetic-trees/">Scrubbing it out of the air with &#8220;synthetic trees.&#8221;</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;d heard about scrubbing ideas before, but I had never heard about them being close to production.</p>
<blockquote><p>If you were to install 10 million of them, you would pull back on the order of 3.6 gigatons of C02 a year. The world right now produces 30 gigatons of C02 a year. In 2006, the world made 73 million cars. They are comparable in size, and ultimately comparable in cost.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uspolitical.com/synthetic-trees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$1,400,000,000,000</title>
		<link>http://uspolitical.com/1400000000000/</link>
		<comments>http://uspolitical.com/1400000000000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uspolitical.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great video about what $1.4 trillion can buy.

Sure,there were bailouts this year, but why is the deficit expected to remain the same next year?  Anyone realize how bizarre it is that Obama was championing a halving of the deficit by the end of his first term?
Hate tip: Ed Morrissey
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great video about what $1.4 trillion can buy.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="580" height="360" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JxQgqqnpxo4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999&amp;border=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="580" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JxQgqqnpxo4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999&amp;border=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Sure,there were bailouts this year, but why is the deficit expected to remain the same next year?  Anyone realize how bizarre it is that Obama was championing a halving of the deficit by the end of his first term?</p>
<p>Hate tip: <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/20/video-what-would-the-federal-deficit-buy/" target="_blank">Ed Morrissey</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uspolitical.com/1400000000000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fishy</title>
		<link>http://uspolitical.com/fishy/</link>
		<comments>http://uspolitical.com/fishy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 07:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uspolitical.com/fishy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hardly know what to say about this post on WhiteHouse.gov.
Scary chain emails and videos are starting to percolate on the internet, breathlessly claiming, for example, to &#8220;uncover&#8221; the truth about the Presidentâ€™s health insurance reform positions
There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there, spanning from control of personal finances to end [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hardly know what to say about <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts-Are-Stubborn-Things/" target="_blank">this post on WhiteHouse.gov.</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Scary chain emails and videos are starting to percolate on the internet, breathlessly claiming, for example, to &#8220;uncover&#8221; the truth about the Presidentâ€™s health insurance reform positions</p>
<p>There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there, spanning from control of personal finances to end of life care.Â  These rumors often travel just below the surface via chain emails or through casual conversation.Â  <em><strong>Since we canâ€™t keep track of all of them here at the White House, weâ€™re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to flag@whitehouse.gov.</strong></em></p></blockquote>
<p>My email response to flag@whitehouse.gov:</p>
<blockquote><p>fromÂ Â  Â Ryan Farnes<br />
toÂ Â  Â flag@whitehouse.gov<br />
dateÂ Â  Â Fri, Aug 7, 2009</p>
<p>subjectÂ Â  Â Really?</p>
<p>The White House is asking citizens to report on chain emails and word of mouth?</p>
<p>My opinion of fishy?<br />
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts-Are-Stubborn-Things/</p>
<p>Ryan Farnes</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uspolitical.com/fishy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Energy Bill &amp; Energy Czar</title>
		<link>http://uspolitical.com/energy-bill-energy-czar/</link>
		<comments>http://uspolitical.com/energy-bill-energy-czar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uspolitical.com/energy-bill-energy-czar/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Energy Czar Carole Browner, responsible for the Executive Branch&#8217;s &#8220;Office of Energy and Climate Change Policy,&#8221; has not read the bill that passed the House of Representatives in its entirety.

Hat tip: Townhall.com&#8217;s Greg Hengler 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Energy Czar Carole Browner, responsible for the Executive Branch&#8217;s &#8220;Office of Energy and Climate Change Policy,&#8221; has not read the bill that passed the House of Representatives in its entirety.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fEx-m4B9O_M&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fEx-m4B9O_M&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>Hat tip: <a href="http://townhall.com/blog/g/cc672ea9-84fc-404e-8b93-29a01c3b9cd6" target="_blank">Townhall.com&#8217;s Greg Hengler </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uspolitical.com/energy-bill-energy-czar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some Things Just Can&#8217;t Be Explained</title>
		<link>http://uspolitical.com/some-things-just-cant-be-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://uspolitical.com/some-things-just-cant-be-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uspolitical.com/some-things-just-cant-be-explained/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rod Blagojevich was in the news for one of the more bizarre &#8220;post-scandal&#8221; things I have ever seen.
Former Illinois Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich says itâ€™s difficult watching his wife, Patti, fill in for him on a reality show, but he appreciated the former Illinois first ladyâ€™s televised exercise in tarantula-eating as an â€œact of love.â€
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090604/pl_politico/23344" target="_blank">Rod Blagojevich was in the news</a> for one of the more bizarre &#8220;post-scandal&#8221; things I have ever seen.</p>
<blockquote><p>Former Illinois Democratic Gov. <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1244146197_0">Rod Blagojevich</span> says itâ€™s difficult watching his wife, Patti, fill in for him on a reality show, but he appreciated the former Illinois first ladyâ€™s televised exercise in tarantula-eating as an â€œ<span style="background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; cursor: pointer; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1244146197_1">act of love</span>.â€</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uspolitical.com/some-things-just-cant-be-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political Correctness</title>
		<link>http://uspolitical.com/political-correctness/</link>
		<comments>http://uspolitical.com/political-correctness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 08:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uspolitical.com/political-correctness/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps CNN thought it was irrelevant to mention the Islamic religious affiliation of those planning to bomb a synagogue and shoot down a US military airplane.
The CNN article doesn&#8217;t once mention any sort of religious affiliation, desire to avenge muslim deaths, nor the desire to, &#8220;do jihad.&#8221;Â  I suppose it was not an important detail.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/05/21/ny.bomb.plot/index.html" target="_blank">CNN thought it was irrelevant</a> to mention the <a href="http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/posted/archive/2009/05/20/new-york-terror-plot-broken-up-by-fbi-police.aspx" target="_blank">Islamic religious affiliation</a> of those planning to bomb a synagogue and shoot down a US military airplane.</p>
<p>The CNN article doesn&#8217;t once mention any sort of religious affiliation, desire to avenge muslim deaths, nor the desire to, &#8220;do jihad.&#8221;Â  I suppose it was not an important detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uspolitical.com/political-correctness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
